Samsung S26 Ultra vs iPhone / Google / OnePlus / Oppo / Xiaomi Battery Test
11:50
Watch on YouTube ↗
M
Mrwhosetheboss·Tech

Samsung S26 Ultra vs iPhone / Google / OnePlus / Oppo / Xiaomi Battery Test

TL;DR

Oppo won with 14h16m despite a smaller battery than rivals, while Google Pixel finished last despite having more capacity than Samsung.

Key Points

  • 1.Rankings (longest to shortest): Oppo FindX 9 Pro (14h 16m) → OnePlus 15 (~13h) → Samsung S26 Ultra (12h) → iPhone 17 Pro Max → Xiaomi 17 Ultra → Samsung S25 Ultra → Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (dead first)
  • 2.Why Chinese phones have bigger batteries: OnePlus (7,300 mAh) and Oppo (7,500 mAh) use *dual* silicon-carbon cells, bypassing single-cell shipping regulations — a more expensive solution that Samsung, Apple, and Google largely avoid
  • 3.Xiaomi underperformed its 6,800 mAh spec because the global variant restricts the cell to comply with shipping regulations, delivering only ~5,400–5,800 mAh of usable capacity
  • 4.Google Pixel 10 Pro XL had the worst performance scores (lowest on the entire table, behind even the S25 Ultra), ran the hottest during normal use, and died first — despite having a *larger* battery than Samsung
  • 5.Thermal advantage: Samsung S26 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max were the coolest phones (~27°C), both having switched from titanium to aluminum frames this generation, which helped efficiency and likely contributed to the S26 Ultra improving on last year's result

Life's too short for long videos.

Summarize any YouTube video in seconds.

Quit Yapping — Try it Free →